Cholangiocarcinoma – 8 Interesting Facts
- Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare and highly proliferative malignant tumor originating from the bile duct epithelium; it usually occurs in the sixth or seventh decade of life 1
- Patients are asymptomatic in early stages of disease; they may present with jaundice, abdominal pain and mass, ascites, and hepatomegaly in the later stages
- Diagnosis is based on symptoms and signs suggestive of hepatic mass or biliary obstruction, abnormal liver function test results and imaging findings, and histopathologic analysis 2
- Method of tissue sampling for histology is based on results of initial imaging and may include direct biopsy of tumor, cytologic brushing, or sampling of regional lymph nodes 23
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the procedure of choice for direct biopsy or cytologic brushing
- First line curative option for the minority of patients with limited disease is complete resection with adjuvant systemic therapy
- Most cases are nonresectable, and prognosis is poor
- Complications may result from disease progression or treatment and can include liver failure, severe infections (eg, cholangitis), distant metastasis, bleeding, and bowel perforation
Pitfalls
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is often asymptomatic and extremely difficult to diagnose early; it may present with painless jaundice or with abdominal pain developing with disease progression and obstruction of bile ducts
Introduction
- Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare and highly proliferative malignant tumor originating from the bile duct epithelium; it usually occurs in the sixth or seventh decade of life 1
- Second most common liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma 4
- Incidence rates in the United States are 1.6 per 100,000 population 5
- Incidence rates in Southeast Asia are as high as 85 per 100,000 population (northern Thailand) 5
Classification
- Classification is based on anatomic location on the biliary tree 6
- Anatomic classification guides clinical evaluation and contributes to determination of appropriate treatment and of prognosis 26
- Intrahepatic: located proximal to second-degree bile ducts 78
- Macroscopic subtypes include: 9
- Mass forming (nodular)
- Periductal infiltrating (infiltrating along the bile duct)
- Mass forming and periductal infiltrating (infiltrating along the bile duct with concurrent invasion into adjacent liver parenchyma, causing a mass)
- Intraductal growing (now reclassified as intraductal papillary neoplasm)
- Histologic subtypes based on duct type involved 9
- Large duct type; occurs in chronic cholangitis caused by primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatolithiasis, and liver fluke infection
- Small duct type: often associated with nonbiliary chronic liver diseases (eg, viral hepatitis), and long-term outcomes are better because they are often amenable to targeted therapy
- Macroscopic subtypes include: 9
- Perihilar: located between second-degree bile ducts and insertion of cystic duct into common bile duct 10
- Subtypes include intraductal and exophytic 2
- Intraductal papillary lesions carry a favorable prognosis
- Exophytic tumor is likely to metastasize and carries a poor prognosis
- Bismuth-Corlette staging classification 11
- Provides an anatomic description of tumor location and tumor extension along biliary tree
- Does not describe the radial extension of tumor
- Provides a practical way to describe the lesion and the anticipated extent of liver resection required for complete excision
- Subtypes include intraductal and exophytic 2
- Distal: located between origin of cystic duct and ampulla of Vater 2
- Subtypes include nodular, sclerosing, and papillary 12
- Papillary tumors have a more favorable prognosis
- Nodular and sclerosing tumors carry a poor prognosis
- Subtypes include nodular, sclerosing, and papillary 12
- Mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular
- Recently classified as a distinct type 13
- Associated with worse prognosis than hepatocellular carcinoma
- Intrahepatic: located proximal to second-degree bile ducts 78
- TNM classification according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (2018) allows disease staging to further direct treatment and provide crucial prognostic information 1415
- Intrahepatic tumor (includes intrahepatic and hepatocellular-cholangiocellular subtypes) 15
- Tumor status
- TX: primary tumor cannot be assessed
- T0: no evidence of primary tumor
- Tis: carcinoma in situ (intraductal tumor)
- T1: solitary tumor without vascular invasion
- T1a: solitary tumor of 5 cm or less without vascular invasion
- T1b: solitary tumor greater than 5 cm without vascular invasion
- T2: solitary tumor with vascular invasion or multiple tumors; none larger than 5 cm
- T3: multiple tumors larger than 5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic veins
- T4: tumor or tumors with direct invasion of adjacent organs other than the gallbladder or with perforation of visceral peritoneum
- Lymph node status
- NX: regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
- N0: no regional lymph node metastasis
- N1: regional lymph node metastasis
- Metastasis
- MX: distant metastasis cannot be assessed
- M0: no distant metastasis
- M1: distant metastasis
- Prognostic stage grouping 16
- Stage 0: Tis, N0, M0
- Stage IA: T1a, N0, M0
- Stage 1B: T1b, N0, M0
- Stage II: T2, N0, M0
- Stage IIIA: T3, N0, M0
- Stage IIIB: T4, N0, M0
- Stage IIIB: any T, N1, M0
- Stage IV: any T, any N, M1
- Tumor status
- Extrahepatic tumor (includes perihilar and distal subtypes) 14
- Tumor status
- TX: primary tumor cannot be assessed
- Tis: carcinoma in situ or high-grade dysplasia
- T1: tumor invades bile duct wall with a depth less than 5 mm
- T2: tumor invades bile duct wall with a depth of 5 to 12 mm
- T3: tumor invades bile duct wall with a depth more than 12 mm
- T4: tumor invades the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, and/or common hepatic artery
- Lymph node status
- NX: regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
- N0: no regional lymph node metastasis
- N1: metastasis in 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes
- N2: metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes
- Metastasis
- M0: no distant metastasis
- M1: distant metastasis
- Prognostic stage grouping 16
- Stage 0: Tis, N0, M0
- Stage I: T1, N0, M0
- Stage IIA: T1, N1, M0
- Stage IIIA: T1, N2, M0
- Stage IIA: T2, N0, M0
- Stage IIB: T2, N1, M0
- Stage IIIA: T2, N2, M0
- Stage IIB: T3, N0, M0
- Stage IIB: T3, N1, M0
- Stage IIIA: T3, N2, M0
- Stage IIIB: T4, N0, M0
- Stage IIIB: T4, N1, M0
- Stage IIIB: T4, N2, M0
- Stage IV: any T, any N, M1 (distal extrahepatic bile duct cancer)
- Stage IVA: any T, N2, M0 (perihilar bile duct cancer)
- Stage IVB: any T, any N, M1 (perihilar bile duct cancer)
- Tumor status
- Intrahepatic tumor (includes intrahepatic and hepatocellular-cholangiocellular subtypes) 15
Diagnosis
Clinical Presentation
History
- Asymptomatic in early stages of disease, especially for patients with intrahepatic disease
- Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may present with only malaise, weight loss, and abdominal pain
- Patients with perihilar or distal disease may present with symptoms of biliary obstruction, including painless jaundice, pale stools, dark urine, and pruritus
- Other symptoms may include the following: 17
- Fatigue
- Anorexia
- Nausea and vomiting (with severe obstruction)
Physical examination
- Scleral icterus or frank jaundice
- Abdomen 17
- Tender palpable mass in right upper quadrant
- Hepatomegaly
- Ascites
Causes and Risk Factors
Causes
- Cause is unknown
Risk factors and/or associations
Age
- Age of onset is usually in the sixth or seventh decade of life, but the disease can occur earlier 1
Sex
- Incidence worldwide is higher in males than in females; however, the difference in rates between males and females has narrowed in recent years 18
Genetics
- Several acquired genetic variants are present in a subset of patients 219
- Sequence variants can be associated with increased risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma and with poorer prognosis
Ethnicity/race
- Increased incidence in populations with Asian ethnicity and in those with Hispanic ethnicity 20
- In the United States, mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are highest in American Indian, Alaskan native, and Asian American populations 20
- Highest incidence rates worldwide are in Southeast Asia and China 21
Other risk factors/associations
- Established risk factors account for less than 30% of all cases 22
- Parasitic (liver fluke) infections, including Opisthorchis viverrini and Opisthorchis sinensis (also called Clonorchis sinensis)
- Chronic infection with liver flukes is the main cause of cholangiocarcinoma in northeast Thailand and surrounding areas (which have highest cholangiocarcinoma rates globally) 10
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Results in chronic inflammation and segmental stenosis of bile ducts and in biliary cirrhosis
- Main risk factor in the Western world but accounts for no more than 10% of all cases 10 23
- Choledochal cysts
- Congenital condition characterized by cystic dilation of bile ducts that results in reflux of pancreatic enzymes and cholestasis
- Incidence is higher in Asian populations
- Hepatolithiasis
- Calculi form in bile ducts, resulting in cholestasis, inflammation, and infection
- Prevalence is higher in East Asian populations
- Exposure to Thorotrast (radiographic contrast agent) 24
- Thorotrast was used until the 1950s
- 16- to 45-year latency between exposure and malignancy
- Cirrhosis
- Hepatitis B
- Hepatitis C
- Less-established risk factors include the following:
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Smoking
- Alcohol consumption
- Choledocholithiasis and cholangitis
- Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) 25
- Biliary papillomatosis 25
- Parasitic (liver fluke) infections, including Opisthorchis viverrini and Opisthorchis sinensis (also called Clonorchis sinensis)
Diagnostic Procedures
Classification of cholangiocarcinoma.From Rizvi SH et al: Tumors of the bile ducts, gallbladder, and ampulla. In: Feldman M et al, eds: Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 11th ed. Elsevier; 2021:1096-112.e5, Figure 69.1.
Primary diagnostic tools
- Suspect diagnosis on basis of symptoms and signs suggestive of hepatic mass or biliary obstruction, abnormal liver function test results, and imaging findings 26
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is often asymptomatic and detected on imaging
- Confirm diagnosis with tumor biopsy, cytologic brushings, or fine-needle lymph node biopsy; may not be required before resection if malignancy is highly likely 2 17 27
- Subsequent investigations to determine nature of mass, presence and degree of obstruction, and extent of disease, and to guide treatment, vary by whether malignancy is intrahepatic or extrahepatic; they may include: 27
- Laboratory
- Viral hepatitis serology
- Diagnostic tumor biomarker testing (eg, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, alpha fetoprotein)
- Comprehensive molecular profiling is recommended for patients with unresectable or metastatic tumors who are candidates for systemic therapy (specifically microsatellite instability, mismatch repair testing, tumor mutation burden testing, and NTRK gene fusion testing) 16 27
- Serum IgG4 level
- Imaging 2
- CT or MRI of abdomen and pelvis
- Chest CT
- Endoscopic ultrasonogram
- Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (preferred)
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram
- Other investigations that may be considered include:
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy
- Staging laparoscopy
- Laboratory
-
- Staging laparoscopy
Laboratory
- Liver function tests 17
- Markers for biliary obstruction include levels of the following:
- Bilirubin
- Alkaline phosphatase
- 5′-nucleotidase
- γ-glutamyltransferase
- All of these test results may be within reference range in early stages of disease
- Elevations in liver function test results will be determined by degree and duration of bile duct obstruction
- Isolated elevation of alkaline phosphatase level, γ-glutamyltransferase level, or both is found in biliary disease
- Markers for hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT) initially may be within reference range but will become elevated in the setting of chronic biliary obstruction; these markers also initially may be elevated in the setting of preexisting liver disease (eg, hepatitis or cirrhosis)
- Markers for biliary obstruction include levels of the following:
- Diagnostic tumor biomarker tests
- There is no single effective biomarker test for diagnosis 2 17 28
- Do not use carbohydrate antigen 19-9 or carcinoembryonic antigen alone to diagnose 27
- Blood, urine, and tissue may be tested for presence of tumor markers 1728
- Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 217
- Most useful as prognostic indicator when obtained preoperatively; consider baseline measurement after biliary decompression in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 27
- In unexplained biliary disease, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels of 100 units/mL or higher are considered suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma in the absence of an inflammatory process 17
- Concentrations higher than 1000 units/mL are consistent with advanced disease, often involving the peritoneum
- May be elevated in other malignancies and infections 28
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- Sensitivity of only 62%
- Specificity of only 63%
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- May be elevated in primary sclerosing or bacterial cholangitis 29
- Cholangiocarcinoma with primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Sensitivity from 50% to 100%
- Specificity from 50% to 98%
- Cholangiocarcinoma with primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Carcinoembryonic antigen 217
- Has been used to detect cholangiocarcinoma, but elevated levels have significant overlap with other benign diseases and low sensitivity for early-stage disease
- Cholangiocarcinoma
- Sensitivity from 33% to 84% 30 31
- Specificity from 33% to 100%
- Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 217
- Tissue biopsy or cytologic brushing obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or transhepatic cholangiogram
- Cytology includes conventional analysis and, if available, fluorescence in situ hybridization 32
- Fine-needle aspiration
- Fine-needle aspiration of lymph node tissue is a valuable aid in confirmation of metastatic perihilar cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis 3
- Do not use during endoscopic ultrasonography to evaluate perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, because there is a high risk of needle tract seeding of tumor 33 34
Imaging
- MRI or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- Intrahepatic tumors
- Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is considered the optimal imaging modality 8
- MRI and CT scans are equally valuable for distinguishing between cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in tumors larger than 2 cm 28
- Perihilar and distal tumors
- MRI is the preferred first line imaging method to evaluate the primary tumor
- MRI can detect bile duct dilation and any perihilar mass
- Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography delineates the extent of the bile duct lesion more effectively than CT scan
- Intrahepatic tumors
- CT scan
- Intrahepatic tumors
- CT has been validated for diagnosis of intrahepatic tumors 35
- CT will frequently show characteristic arterial enhancement (known as rim enhancement) of tumor margins 2
- MRI and CT scans are equally valuable for distinguishing between cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma for tumors larger than 2 cm 28
- Perihilar and distal tumors
- CT is primarily used to determine portal vein and arterial involvement during preoperative planning, but it has a low sensitivity for detecting lymph node metastasis (54%) 8 28
- CT is often used with MRI for staging and preoperative planning
- Intrahepatic tumors
- Endoscopic ultrasonography
- May be helpful when bile duct is dilated but no mass seen on CT or MRI; can be used to obtain tissue for histological diagnosis and provide access to relieve biliary obstruction 27
- May perform in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 10
- Patients should first have triple-phase CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis and chest along with dynamic MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography if proximal biliary obstruction is suspected 10
- May be helpful when bile duct is dilated but no mass seen on CT or MRI; can be used to obtain tissue for histological diagnosis and provide access to relieve biliary obstruction 27
Procedures
- Contrast material is injected through a fiberoptic endoscope to visualize biliary tree 28
- Tissue samples are obtained via brushing, bile samples, and core needle biopsies (preferred 27) 28
- May also include placement of obstruction-relieving stent
- Assess morphology of bile ducts in suspected cholangiocarcinoma 17
- Distinguish benign from malignant strictures in biliary tract 17
- Has additional palliative therapeutic role: biliary stent insertion for therapeutic decompression of obstruction 36
- History of the following may increase risk of procedure-related pancreatitis: 37
- Previous occurrence of such (ie, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography–related pancreatitis)
- Recurrent pancreatitis
- Abdominal surgery and other surgeries
- Contraindicated in patients at high risk of infection, such as cholangitis or sepsis 17 37
- Bowel perforation
- Bleeding
- Perforation of bile duct
- Air embolism
- Hepatic hematoma
- Cholangitis
- Imaging finds areas of obstruction in bile ducts
- Molecular analysis of fine-needle aspirate biopsies may find tumor cells 36
- Advanced cytology techniques may detect aneuploidy or aneusomy 36
- Invasive procedure in which an ultrasonography-guided thin needle is inserted into bile ducts for injection of contrast agent for imaging 38
- Tissue samples obtained via brushing, bile samples, and core needle biopsies (preferred) 38
- To visualize bile ducts in place when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not feasible owing to contraindication or patient refusal 38
- To assess morphology of bile ducts 17
- To sample tissue for histologic and cytologic confirmation of malignancy 17
- Hemorrhagic diathesis
- Abdominal ascites
- Bowel or bile duct perforation
- Intra-abdominal bleeding or hepatic hematoma
- Inadequate sampling
- Imaging finds areas of obstruction in bile ducts
- Histologic analysis of fine-needle aspirate biopsies may find tumor cells, and advanced cytology techniques may detect aneuploidy or aneusomy from brush samples 36
Differential Diagnosis
Most common
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
- Malignancy derived from hepatocytes
- Major risk factors include chronic hepatitis B and C and cirrhosis
- Most common in East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
- Initially may be asymptomatic or may present with abdominal pain, most often in the setting of cirrhosis
- Clinical appearance is similar to intrahepatic mass-forming and mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular types
- Can be distinguished via immunohistochemistry or CT imaging
- Benign strictures
- Occur most commonly as a result of trauma or inflammation
- Most traumatic benign strictures are result of previous surgery
- Most inflammatory benign strictures are the result of previous pancreatitis or cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, or inflammatory pseudotumors
- May be confused with intrahepatic periductal lesions
- No associated lymph node enlargement compared with cholangiocarcinoma
- Have symmetrical narrowing and short segments as compared with cholangiocarcinoma; visible with MRI
- Hepatolithiasis
- Stone formation associated with bacterial infection, bile stasis, and hypersecretion of mucus in biliary tree
- Occurs most commonly in middle-aged and older adults in East Asian countries
- Patients may have a history of recurring fever, abdominal pain, and cholangitis
- May be confused with intrahepatic intraductal lesions
- Stones show no contrast enhancement on MRI
Treatment
Goals
- Completely resect tumor while maintaining continuity of bilioenteric system
- Provide palliative care for patients with nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma to alleviate pain and associated physiologic and psychological stress
Disposition
Admission criteria
- Send patient to emergency department or admit to hospital if complications of tumor or treatment exist, including the following:
- Cholangitis
- Sepsis
- Biliary obstruction
- Bile leakage into abdomen
Recommendations for specialist referral
- Refer patients with suspected cholangiocarcinoma to the following specialists:
- Hepatologist for biliary tract, liver, and pancreatic procedures
- Oncologist for management of radiation and chemotherapy
- Gastroenterologist for extrahepatic types
Treatment Options
General overview 27
- Approach to treatment is based on tumor type and extent of disease
- Intrahepatic and mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular types
- Complete surgical excision of tumor is the treatment of choice for patients with resectable tumors. Patients with intrahepatic or lymph node metastases or vascular invasion should not undergo resection
- May be accomplished by means of wedge or segmental resection or may require major hepatic resection; also perform regional lymphadenectomy of porta hepatis 27
- After R0 resection, preferred options are systemic therapy or participation in a clinical trial; observation is also an option 27
- For patients with positive microscopic margins or regional lymph nodes, systemic therapy or participation in a clinical trial is preferred; other options include fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation or fluoropyrimidine- or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or vice versa 39 40
- Capecitabine is the preferred agent for systemic therapy; Us and European guidelines recommend 6-month course 9 10 27 41
- Options specific for intrahepatic unresectable or metastatic disease include:
- Locoregional therapies (eg, external beam radiation therapy, arterially directed therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization 42 and transarterial radioembolization, radiofrequency ablation)
- Chemotherapy or combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy may be effective in downstaging locally advanced tumors, allowing for resection in patients with initially unresectable disease 9 43 44 45
- Liver transplant is not recommended owing to high recurrence rates; however, liver transplant for early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (3 cm or less) arising in the setting of cirrhosis is being investigated and may be considered under study protocols 9
- Complete surgical excision of tumor is the treatment of choice for patients with resectable tumors. Patients with intrahepatic or lymph node metastases or vascular invasion should not undergo resection
- Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- Consider biliary drainage for patients with jaundice before initiating definite treatment
- Determine whether patient is candidate for resection of tumor or liver transplant
- Complete surgical excision of tumor is the treatment of choice for patients with resectable tumors; typically requires pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) for distal tumors and major hepatic resection for hilar tumors
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery is not routinely recommended 10
- After R0 resection, preferred options are systemic therapy or participation in a clinical trial; others include observation or fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation 27
- After resection, patients with positive microscopic margins or regional lymph nodes should preferably undergo systemic therapy or participate in a clinical trial; other options include fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation, or fluoropyrimidine- or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or vice versa 27
- Adjuvant radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 46
- Referral to transplant center if patient is a candidate (those with unresectable perihilar or hilar tumors 3 cm or less in diameter, no extrahepatic or intrahepatic metastases, and no nodal disease, and patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis); neoadjuvant therapy is given 274748
- Long-term survival benefit reported in carefully selected patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by transplant 49
- Treatment options available for both intrahepatic and extrahepatic unresectable or metastatic disease 27
- Systemic therapy
- First line therapy regimen for advanced disease consists of cisplatin and gemcitabine with either durvalumab or pembrolizumab 9 10 27 50
- Patients with advanced cholangiocarcinomas (both intrahepatic and extrahepatic) who harbor certain molecular alterations may be candidates for targeted treatments
- FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangement: pemigatinib, futibatinib
- IDH1 variants: ivosidenib 51
- BRAF V600E variants: dabrafenib and trametinib
- Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability–high: pembrolizumab, dostarlimab-gxly
- RET gene fusions: pralsetinib, selpercatinib
- NTRK gene fusions: entrectinib, larotrectinib
- HER-2 (ERBB2) variants: trastuzumab and pertuzumab
- TMB-H (tumor mutation burden–high): nivolumab + ipilimumab, pembrolizumab
- Enrollment in a clinical trial
- Best supportive care
- Radiation therapy with or without concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy
- Systemic therapy
Outcomes
- Only 20% of patients have resectable disease at diagnosis 52
- Intrahepatic and mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular types
- 5-year overall survival rate after complete surgical excision is 15% to 40% 53
- Overall survival for transarterial chemoembolization is 12 to 15 months 54
- Overall survival for chemotherapy is 11.7 months 55
- Overall survival for transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization is up to 22 months 56
- Perihilar type
- 5-year survival rate after surgery is 20% to 30% 57
- 5-year recurrence-free survival rate after liver transplant is 68%, and 5-year recurrence rate is 12% 47 48
- Life expectancy with biliary drainage is up to 19 months 58
- Distal type
- 5-year survival rate is only 27% after surgical excision with negative surgical margins 3
Drug therapy
Drug Therapy: Cholangiocarcinoma.
Medication | Common regimens | Life-threatening or dose-limiting adverse reactions | Notable or nonemergent adverse reactions | Special considerations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alkylating agent: platinum | ||||
Cisplatin | • Durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin • Pembrolizumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin | • Anaphylaxis • Bone marrow suppression • Nausea and/or vomiting • Nephrotoxicity • Ocular toxicity • Peripheral neuropathy | • Injection site reaction • Ototoxicity • Secondary malignancy | • Avoid coadministering nephrotoxic or ototoxic agents • Ensure adequate hydration • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 14 months for females of reproductive potential and for 11 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Oxaliplatin | • Oxaliplatin + leucovorin + fluorouracil | • Anaphylaxis • Bleeding • Bone marrow suppression • Gastrointestinal toxicity • Peripheral sensory neuropathy • PRES • Pulmonary fibrosis • QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias • Rhabdomyolysis | • Fatigue • Increased hepatic enzymes | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 9 months for females of reproductive potential and for 6 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Antimetabolite: nucleoside metabolic inhibitor | ||||
Capecitabine | • Capecitabine monotherapy | • Bone marrow suppression • Cardiotoxicity • Dehydration • Dermatologic toxicity • Diarrhea • Hyperbilirubinemia • Nephrotoxicity • Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) | • Abdominal pain • Fatigue • Nausea and/or vomiting | • Increased risk of serious or fatal adverse reactions in patients with low or absent dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 6 months for females of reproductive potential and for 3 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Fluorouracil | • Fluorouracil monotherapy • Oxaliplatin + leucovorin + fluorouracil | • Bone marrow suppression • Cardiotoxicity • Diarrhea • Hyperammonemic encephalopathy • Mucositis • Neurotoxicity • Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) | • Closely monitor PT and INR during concomitant warfarin use due to risk for excessive prolongation of PT or INR and bleeding • Increased risk of serious or fatal adverse reactions in patients with low or absent dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for up to 3 months for females of reproductive potential and for 3 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential | |
Gemcitabine | • Durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin • Pembrolizumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin | • Bone marrow suppression • Capillary leak syndrome • Hemolytic uremic syndrome • Hepatotoxicity • PRES • Pulmonary toxicity • Radiation sensitization/recall | • Edema • Fever • Hematuria • Increased hepatic enzymes • Nausea and/or vomiting • Proteinuria • Rash | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 6 months for females of reproductive potential and for 3 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
CTLA-4–blocking antibody | ||||
Ipilimumab | • Nivolumab + ipilimumab | • Adrenal insufficiency • Colitis • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Exfoliative dermatitis • Hepatitis • Hyperthyroidism • Hypophysitis • Hypothyroidism • Infusion-related reactions • Myocarditis • Nephritis • Neurotoxicity • Ocular toxicity • Pneumonitis • Thyroiditis | • Anorexia • Diarrhea • Fatigue • Fever • Headache • Insomnia • Nausea and/or vomiting • Pruritus • Rash • Weight loss | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 3 months for females of reproductive potential |
HER2/neu receptor antagonist | ||||
Pertuzumab | • Pertuzumab + trastuzumab | • Anaphylaxis • Cardiomyopathy • Infusion-related reactions | • Alopecia • Constipation • Diarrhea • Fatigue • Nausea and/or vomiting • Neutropenia | • Effective contraception required during and after combined therapy with trastuzumab for 7 months for females of reproductive potential |
Trastuzumab | • Pertuzumab + trastuzumab | • Cardiomyopathy • Infusion-related reactions • Neutropenia • Pulmonary toxicity | • Anemia • Chills • Cough • Diarrhea • Dysgeusia • Fatigue • Fever • Headache • Infection • Insomnia • Mucosal inflammation • Nasopharyngitis • Nausea • Rash • Stomatitis • Thrombocytopenia • Weight loss | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 7 months for females of reproductive potential |
IDH1 inhibitor | ||||
Ivosidenib | • Ivosidenib monotherapy | • Differentiation syndrome • Guillain-Barre syndrome • Leukocytosis • QT prolongation | • Abdominal pain • Anorexia • Arthralgia • Ascites • Bone marrow suppression • Diarrhea • Electrolyte loss • Fatigue • Hyperbilirubinemia • Hyperglycemia • Hyperuricemia • Hypoalbuminemia • Increased hepatic enzymes • Mucositis • Myalgia • Nausea and/or vomiting • Pruritus | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs |
Kinase inhibitor | ||||
Dabrafenib | • Dabrafenib + trametinib | • Bleeding • Cardiomyopathy • Dermatologic toxicity • Fever • New primary malignant neoplasm • Uveitis | • Alopecia • Arthralgia • Headache • Hyperglycemia • Papilloma | • Potential risk of hemolytic anemia in patients with G6PD deficiency • Effective nonhormonal contraception required during and after therapy for 2 weeks for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Entrectinib | • Entrectinib monotherapy | • Bone marrow suppression • Heart failure • Hepatotoxicity • Hyperuricemia • Neurotoxicity • QT prolongation • Skeletal fractures • Vision disorders | • Arthralgia • Cognitive impairment • Constipation • Cough • Diarrhea • Dizziness • Dysesthesia • Dysgeusia • Dyspnea • Edema • Fatigue • Fever • Myalgia • Nausea and/or vomiting • Weight gain | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for at least 5 weeks for females of reproductive potential and for 3 months for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Futibatinib | • Futibatinib monotherapy | • Hyperphosphatemia • RPED • Soft tissue mineralization | • Abdominal pain • Alopecia • Anorexia • Arthralgia • Bone marrow suppression • Constipation • Diarrhea • Dry eye, mouth, or skin • Dysgeusia • Electrolyte abnormalities • Fatigue • Hyperbilirubinemia • Hyperglycemia • Hypoalbuminemia • Hypoglycemia • Increased hepatic enzymes • Increased PT or INR • Increased serum creatinine • Myalgia • Nail toxicity • Nausea and/or vomiting • Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) • Prolonged aPTT • Stomatitis • Urinary tract infection | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for at least 1 week for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Larotrectinib | • Larotrectinib monotherapy | • Hepatotoxicity • Neurotoxicity • Skeletal fractures | • Abdominal pain • Anemia • Constipation • Cough • Diarrhea • Dizziness • Fatigue • Fever • Hypoalbuminemia • Hypocalcemia • Leukopenia • Lymphopenia • Musculoskeletal pain • Nausea and/or vomiting • Neutropenia | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for at least 1 week for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Pemigatinib | • Pemigatanib monotherapy | • Hyperphosphatemia • RPED • Soft tissue mineralization | • Abdominal pain • Alopecia • Anemia • Anorexia • Arthralgia • Back pain • Constipation • Diarrhea • Dizziness • Dry eye, mouth, or skin • Dysgeusia • Dyspepsia • Epistaxis • Extremity pain • Fatigue • Hypophosphatemia • Nail toxicity • Nausea and/or vomiting • Peripheral edema • Rash • Stomatitis • Vision blurred | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for at least 1 week for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Pralsetinib | • Pralsetinib monotherapy | • Bleeding • Hepatotoxicity • Hypertension • Impaired wound healing • Interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis • Tumor lysis syndrome | • Bone marrow suppression • Constipation • Cough • Diarrhea • Edema • Electrolyte abnormalities • Fatigue • Fever • Hyperbilirubinemia • Myalgia | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs • Withhold therapy for at least 5 days before elective surgery and for at least 2 weeks after major surgery and until adequate wound healing • Effective nonhormonal contraception required during and after therapy for 2 weeks for females of reproductive potential and for 1 week for males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Selpercatinib | • Selpercatinib monotherapy | • Bleeding • Hepatotoxicity • Hypersensitivity reactions • Hypertension • Hypothyroidism • Impaired wound healing • Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis • QT prolongation • Tumor lysis syndrome | • Abdominal pain • Constipation • Diarrhea • Dry mouth • Edema • Fatigue • Headache • Hypertension • Hypocalcemia • Hyponatremia • Increased hepatic enzymes • Lymphopenia • Nausea • Rash | • Drug interactions: may need to avoid or adjust dosage of certain drugs • Withhold therapy for at least 1 week before elective surgery and at least 2 weeks after major surgery and until adequate wound healing • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 1 week for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
Trametinib | • Dabrafenib + trametinib | • Bleeding • Cardiomyopathy • Colitis and gastrointestinal perforation • Dermatologic toxicity • Fever • Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis • New primary malignancy • RPED • RVO • Venous thromboembolism | • Diarrhea • Hyperglycemia • Lymphedema | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 4 months for females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential |
PD-L1 blocking antibody | ||||
Durvalumab | • Durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin | • Adrenal insufficiency • Colitis • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Exfoliative dermatitis • Hepatitis • Hyperthyroidism • Hypophysitis • Hypothyroidism • Infusion-related reactions • Intestinal perforation • Myocarditis • Nephritis • Neurotoxicity • Pancreatitis • Pneumonitis • Thyroiditis | • Cough • Dyspnea • Fatigue • Rash • Upper respiratory tract infection | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for at least 3 months for females of reproductive potential |
PD-1 blocking antibody | ||||
Dostarlimab | • Dostarlimab monotherapy | • Adrenal insufficiency • Colitis • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Exfoliative dermatitis • Hepatitis • Hyperthyroidism • Hypophysitis • Hypothyroidism • Infusion-related reactions • Myocarditis • Nephritis • Neurotoxicity • Pneumonitis • Thyroiditis | • Anemia • Asthenia • Diarrhea • Fatigue • Hypoalbuminemia • Hyponatremia • Lymphopenia • Nausea | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 4 months for females of reproductive potential |
Nivolumab | • Nivolumab monotherapy • Nivolumab + ipilimumab | • Adrenal insufficiency • Colitis • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Exfoliative dermatitis • Hepatitis • Hyperthyroidism • Hypophysitis • Hypothyroidism • Infusion-related reactions • Myocarditis • Nephritis • Neurotoxicity • Pneumonitis • Thyroiditis | • Abdominal pain • Anorexia • Arthralgia • Asthenia • Back pain • Constipation • Cough • Diarrhea • Dyspnea • Fatigue • Fever • Headache • Myalgia • Nausea and/or vomiting • Pruritus • Rash • Upper respiratory tract infection • Urinary tract infection | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 5 months for females of reproductive potential |
Pembrolizumab | • Pembrolizumab monotherapy | • Adrenal insufficiency • Anaphylaxis • Colitis • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Exfoliative dermatitis • Hepatitis • Hyperthyroidism • Hypophysitis • Hypothyroidism • Infusion-related reactions • Myocarditis • Nephritis • Neurotoxicity • Pneumonitis • Thyroiditis | • Abdominal pain • Anorexia • Constipation • Cough • Diarrhea • Dyspnea • Fatigue • Fever • Myalgia • Nausea • Pain • Pruritus • Rash | • Effective contraception required during and after therapy for 4 months for females of reproductive potential |
Caption: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; IDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase-1; INR, international normalized ratio; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; PT, prothrombin time; RPED, retinal pigment epithelial detachment; RVO, retinal vein occlusion.
Citation: Data from Cisplatin. Package insert. Accord Healthcare, Inc.; February 2020. Oxaliplatin. Package insert. Sandoz Inc.; July 2023. Xeloda (capecitabine). Package insert. Genentech, Inc; December 2022. Fluorouracil injection. Package insert. Accord Healthcare, Inc; February 2017. Gemcitabine. Package insert. Armas Pharmaceuticals, Inc; August 2019. Yervoy (ipilimumab). Package insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; February 2023. Perjeta (pertuzumab). Package insert. Genentech USA, Inc: January 2020. Herceptin (trastuzumab). Package insert. Genentech USA, Inc.; February 2021. Tibsovo (ivosidenib). Package insert. Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC; October 2023. Tafinlar (dabrafenib). Package insert. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; February 2024. Rozlytrek (entrectinib). Package insert. Genentech USA, Inc.; October 2023. Lytgobi (futibatinib). Package insert. Taiho Oncology, Inc.; September 2022. Vitrakvi (larotrectinib). Package insert. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.; November 2023. Pemazyre (pemigatinib). Package insert. Incyte Corporation: February 2021. Gavreto (pralsetinib). Package insert. Genentech USA, Inc.; August 2023. Retevmo (selpercatinib). Package insert. Eli Lilly and Company; September 2022. Mekinist (trametinib). Package insert. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; February 2024. Imfinzi (durvalumab). Package insert. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; June 2023. Jemperli (dostarlimab). Package insert. GlaxoSmithKline LLC; March 2024. Opdivo (nivolumab). Package insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; March 2024. Keytruda (pembrolizumab). Package insert. Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp, January 2024.
Nondrug and supportive care
External beam radiation therapy
- Used as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, with or without chemotherapy, in resectable cases 10
- Routinely consider adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma irrespective of margins and nodal status 59
- May be used as primary therapy for nonresectable cases and as palliative treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 10 60 61
Hospice care and support groups are recommended with significant disease progression at stages III and IV
Procedures
Surgery
General explanation
- Removal of bile duct tumors
- Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is best performed at high-volume hepatobiliary centers; refer patients to these centers when resection is being considered 53
- Intrahepatic type
- Partial hepatectomy 2
- In most cases, this is a palliative procedure
- 5-year survival and overall survival rates after surgical resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma range from 15% to 40% 53
- Partial hepatectomy 2
- Perihilar type 62
- Partial hepatectomy, with removal of bile duct, gallbladder, and nearby lymph nodes
- 5-year survival rate for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after surgery is 20% to 30% 57
- Distal type
- Removal of bile duct, nearby lymph nodes, part of pancreas, and part of small intestine. Surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma usually is a Whipple procedure 62
- 5-year survival rate after surgical resection with negative margins is 27% 3
- Mechanical and operational techniques for palliative care include the following:
- Biliary bypass to allow bile drainage to the small bowel 62
- Placement of metal or plastic expandable stent into bile duct to maintain duct patency 62
Indication
- Surgery is performed to completely resect bile duct tumor (only curative option), or to perform hepatectomy for liver transplant
- May be used for palliative care when cure is not possible
- Partial hepatectomy
- Insertion of biliary stents
- Biliary bypass
Contraindications
- Portal hypertension 62
- Cirrhosis 62
- Do not consider curative surgery if the patient has the following:
- Main portal vein encasement 62
- Atrophy of 1 lobe with either involvement of secondary biliary radicles or encasement of contralateral portal vein branch 62
- Involvement of both sides of secondary biliary radicles 62
- N2 lymph node metastasis 62
- Peritoneal or distant metastasis
Complications
- Infection
- Bowel perforation
- Bleeding
- Hepatic failure
Orthotopic liver transplant
General explanation
- Liver is surgically removed and transplanted with a donor liver 63
- Associated with the best outcomes in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; however, few patients meet criteria for this option 48
- 5-year recurrence-free survival rate after liver transplant with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is 68% 47
- 5-year recurrence rate after liver transplant with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is 12% 48
- Currently used in pilot clinical trials of nonresectable cases as therapeutic option 63
Indication
- Unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma up to 3 cm in radial diameter without intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastasis 48
Contraindications
- Prior treatment with chemotherapy or radiation 28
- Prior hepatic or biliary resection 28
- Prior endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration 28
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastasis 28
- Uncontrolled infection 28
- Gallbladder involvement 63
- Tumor larger than 3 cm 63
- Cancer history in past 5 years 28
Complications
- Bowel perforation
- Hepatic failure
- Infection
- Bleeding
- Graft rejection
Comorbidities
- Cirrhosis and other liver disease may exacerbate clinical impact of biliary obstruction32
- Poor baseline performance status resulting from commonly encountered chronic diseases such as diabetes, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and others may preclude surgical intervention or palliative chemotherapy
Monitoring
- Monitor for the following, depending on clinical stage, performance status, and treatment modalities chosen:
- Direct adverse effects of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation
- Patency of biliary drainage
- Effective palliative care, particularly pain control and other symptom relief (eg, pruritus, ascites)
- After resection, obtain imaging every 3 to 6 months for 2 years, then every 6 to 12 months for up to 5 years 27
Complications
- Complications include liver failure, severe infection (including cholangitis), regional disease progression and distant metastasis
- Liver failure will occur in patients with unrelieved bile duct obstruction
- Cholangitis is more likely to occur in patients treated with obstruction-relieving stent
Prognosis
- Overall prognosis is very poor
- Intrahepatic and mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocellular type, with treatment
- 5-year overall survival rate after complete surgical excision is 15% to 40% 53
- Overall survival for transarterial chemoembolization has been reported as 12 to 15 months 54
- Overall survival for chemotherapy has been reported as 11.7 months 55
- Overall survival for transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization has been reported as up to 22 months 56
- Perihilar type, with treatment
- 5-year survival rate after surgery is 20% to 30% 57
- 5-year recurrence-free survival rate after liver transplant is 68%, and 5-year recurrence rate is 12% 47
- Life expectancy with biliary drainage has been reported as up to 19 months 58
- Distal type, with treatment
- 5-year survival rate is only 27% after surgical excision with negative surgical margins 3
- Most important factor in prognosis is tumor resectability 4
- Most tumors explored are not resectable 62
- Patients who have primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma have the lowest 5-year survival rate at 10% 64
Screening
At-risk populations
- Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Up to 50% of cholangiocarcinomas are diagnosed within 1 year of primary sclerosing cholangitis diagnosis 65
- Overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis is about 7% 5
- Other patients at risk include those with cirrhosis, gallbladder polyps, and chronic liver fluke infection
Screening tests
- Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Annual surveillance for cholangiocarcinomas improves survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis 9
- Suggested method is imaging of the biliary tract (MRI with or without magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) in combination with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 measurement every 12 months 9
- In patients with cirrhosis, ultrasonography and serum alpha fetoprotein every 6 months 9
- In patients with gallbladder polyps, ultrasonography every 6 months 9
- In patients infected with liver flukes, ultrasonography every 6 months 9
Prevention
- Reduction in rates of liver fluke infection, hepatitis B and C, HIV, and other preventable risk factors (smoking cessation and decreased alcohol consumption) could theoretically reduce the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, but there are no studies of the effectiveness of such prevention or recommendations for prevention
References
1.Tyson GL et al: Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 54(1):173-84, 2011
View In Article|Cross Reference
2.Razumilava N et al: Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 383(9935):2168-79, 2014
View In Article|Cross Reference
3.Rizvi S et al: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 145(6):1215-29, 2013
View In Article|Cross Reference
4.Ustundag Y: Cholangiocarcinoma: a compact review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 14(42):6458-66, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
5.Khan SA et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology and risk factors. Liver Int. 39(suppl 1):19-31, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
6.Nguyen K et al: Review of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 14(19):2995-9, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
7.Yamasaki S: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 10(4):288-91, 2003
View In Article|Cross Reference
8.Blechacz B et al: Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 8(9):512-22, 2011
View In Article|Cross Reference
9.European Association for the Study of the Liver et al. EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 79(1):181-208, 2023
View In Article|Cross Reference
10.Rushbrook SM et al: British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gut. 73(1):16-46, 2023
View In Article|Cross Reference
11.Valero V 3rd et al: Management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in the era of multimodal therapy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6(4):481-95, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
12.Han JK et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics. 22(1):173-87, 2002
View In Article|Cross Reference
13.Komuta M et al: Histological diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma reflects the different cholangiocyte phenotypes. Hepatology. 55(6):1876-88, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
14.Krasinskas A et al: Distal bile duct. In: Amin MB et al; American Joint Committee on Cancer, eds: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer; 2018:317-25
15.Aloia T et al: Intrahepatic bile ducts. In: Amin MB et al; American Joint Committee on Cancer, eds: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer; 2018:295-302
16.PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board: Bile Duct Cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) Treatment (PDQ): Health Professional Version. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries [internet]. National Library of Medicine website. Updated December 22, 2023. Accessed April 15, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26389308/
View In Article|Cross Reference
17.Van Beers BE: Diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 10(2):87-93, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
18.Van Dyke AL et al: Biliary tract cancer incidence and trends in the United States by demographic group, 1999-2013. Cancer. 125(9):1489-98, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
19.Haga H et al: Molecular diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 22(2):114-23, 2015
View In Article|Cross Reference
20.McLean L et al: Racial and ethnic variations in the epidemiology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Liver Int. 26(9):1047-53, 2006
View In Article|Cross Reference
21.Shaib Y et al: The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 24(2):115-25, 2004
View In Article|Cross Reference
22.Khan SA et al: Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 61(12):1657-69, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
23.LaRusso NF et al: Primary sclerosing cholangitis: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 44(3):746-64, 2006
View In Article|Cross Reference
24.Lipshutz GS et al: Thorotrast-induced liver neoplasia: a collective review. J Am Coll Surg. 195(5):713-8, 2002
View In Article|Cross Reference
25.Mecklin JP et al: The association between cholangiocarcinoma and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 69(5):1112-4, 1992
View In Article|Cross Reference
26.Blechacz B et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 48(1):308-21, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
27.National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Hepatobiliary Cancers. Version 3.2023. NCCN website. Updated February 28, 2024. Accessed April 15, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/
View In Article|Cross Reference
28.Ghouri YA et al: Cancer review: cholangiocarcinoma. J Carcinog. ePub, 2015
View In Article|Cross Reference
29.Fevery J et al: Incidence, diagnosis, and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci. 52(11):3123-35, 2007
View In Article|Cross Reference
30.Nehls O et al: Serum and bile markers for cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 24(2):139-54, 2004
View In Article|Cross Reference
31.Siqueira E et al: Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 56(1):40-7, 2002
View In Article|Cross Reference
32.Razumilava N et al: Classification, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 11(1):13-21.e1, 2013
View In Article|Cross Reference
33.Heimbach JK et al: Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB (Oxford). 13(5):356-60, 2011
View In Article|Cross Reference
34.Levy MJ et al: Endoscopic ultrasound staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 28(3):244-52, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
35.Iavarone M et al: Contrast enhanced CT-scan to diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 58(6):1188-93, 2013
View In Article|Cross Reference
36.Rauws EA et al: Staging of cholangiocarcinoma: the role of endoscopy. HPB (Oxford). 10(2):110-2, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
37.ASGE Standards of Practice Committee et al: Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 85(1):32-47, 2017
View In Article|Cross Reference
38.Mueller PR et al: Fine-needle transhepatic cholangiography: reflections after 450 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 136(1):85-90, 1981
View In Article|Cross Reference
39.Apisarnthanarax S et al: External beam radiation therapy for primary liver cancers: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 12(1):28-51, 2022
View In Article|Cross Reference
40.Valle JW et al: Biliary cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 27(suppl 5):v28-37, 2016
View In Article|Cross Reference
41.Shroff RT et al: Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 37(12):1015-27, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
42.Lv TR et al: The effect of trans arterial chemoembolization in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. ePub, 2022
View In Article|Cross Reference
43.Riby D et al: Downstaging with radioembolization or chemotherapy for initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 27(10):3729-37, 2020
View In Article|Cross Reference
44.Edeline J et al: Radioembolization plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. ePub, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
45.Le Roy B et al: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 105(7):839-47, 2018
View In Article|Cross Reference
46.Kim K et al: Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a multicenter retrospective study (Korean Radiation Oncology Group 18-14). Eur J Cancer. 157:31-9, 2021
View In Article|Cross Reference
47.Darwish Murad S et al: Predictors of pretransplant dropout and posttransplant recurrence in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 56(3):972-81, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
48.Rosen CB et al: Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma. Transpl Int. 23(7):692-7, 2010
View In Article|Cross Reference
49.Cambridge WA et al: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of survival after liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 273(2):240-50, 2021
View In Article|Cross Reference
50.Oh DY et al: Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 7(6):522-32, 2022
View In Article|Cross Reference
51.Zhu AX et al: Final overall survival efficacy results of ivosidenib for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation: the phase 3 randomized clinical ClarIDHy trial. JAMA Oncol. 7(11):1669-77, 2021
View In Article|Cross Reference
52.Ruff SM et al: Clinical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: surgical approaches and systemic therapies. Front Oncol. 14:1321683, 2024
View In Article|Cross Reference
53.Bridgewater J et al: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 60(6):1268-89, 2014
View In Article|Cross Reference
54.Kiefer MV et al: Chemoembolization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with cisplatinum, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, ethiodol, and polyvinyl alcohol: a 2-center study. Cancer. 117(7):1498-505, 2011
View In Article|Cross Reference
55.Valle J et al: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 362(14):1273-81, 2010
View In Article|Cross Reference
56.Hoffmann RT et al: Transarterial hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: factors associated with prolonged survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 35(1):105-16, 2012
View In Article|Cross Reference
57.DeOliveira ML et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg. 245(5):755-62, 2007
View In Article|Cross Reference
58.Martin RC 2nd et al: Cost comparison of endoscopic stenting vs surgical treatment for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 16(4):667-70, 2002
View In Article|Cross Reference
59.Kamarajah SK et al: Survival benefit with adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity-matched National Cancer Database analysis. Cancer. 127(8):1266-74, 2021
View In Article|Cross Reference
60.Lee J et al: Efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Strahlenther Onkol. 195(2):93-102, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
61.Sebastian NT et al: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to chemoradiation or radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 19:66-71, 2019
View In Article|Cross Reference
62.Clary BM et al: Cholangiocarcinoma. In: Holzheimer RG et al, eds: Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented. Zuckschwerdt; 2001
63.Rosen CB et al: Surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: the role of liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford). 10(3):186-9, 2008
View In Article|Cross Reference
64.Boberg KM et al: Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: risk factors and clinical presentation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 37(10):1205-11, 2002
View In Article|Cross Reference
65.Chapman R et al: Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 51(2):660-78, 2010
View In Article|Cross Reference