Humerus trochlea aplasia

Humerus Trochlea Aplasia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review

Introduction

Humerus trochlea aplasia, also known as congenital aplasia or agenesis of the humeral trochlea, is an extremely rare familial bone deformity characterized by complete or near-complete absence of the trochlea of the humerus—the crucial articulating surface normally responsible for forming the ulnohumeral joint. This rare congenital malformation has been described primarily in patients of Japanese descent, though it represents a worldwide rarity in orthopedic pathology.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

The clinical significance of this condition lies in its potential to cause severe elbow dysfunction, progressive deformity (particularly cubitus varus), and delayed-onset ulnar nerve palsy—complications that emerge years or decades after birth due to the abnormal biomechanics of the compromised ulnohumeral articulation. Unlike many other congenital elbow anomalies that are recognized in infancy or early childhood, humerus trochlea aplasia may remain asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic until later in life, when the cumulative mechanical stress on the elbow joint precipitates neurological complications.^{[2][3][4][5][1]}

Epidemiology and Clinical Recognition

Prevalence and Geographic Distribution

• Extremely rare: Humerus trochlea aplasia is one of the rarest congenital elbow deformities, with only scattered case reports in the medical literature^[3][4][5][1]
• Predominantly Japanese cohort: The vast majority of reported cases have been described in Japanese patients, though this likely reflects both geographic clustering of the genetic mutation and heightened clinical awareness in Japanese orthopedic centers^[4][5][1][3]
• Familial pattern: The condition demonstrates familial clustering, indicating a genetic basis; affected families often show multiple generations with the same or similar manifestations^[1][3][4]

Age of Presentation

• Variable presentation: While the condition is congenital (present from birth), clinical manifestation is often delayed, occurring years or decades into life^[5]
• Typical age of symptom onset: Most patients with complications (ulnar nerve palsy, deformity progression) present in late childhood to adulthood^[5][1]
• Neonatal period: Often asymptomatic at birth; the deformity may not be recognized unless specifically examined or evaluated^[3][1]

Bilateral Involvement

• Bilateral in nearly half of patients (approximately 45–50%)^[4][3]
• Symmetrical bilateral involvement: When bilateral, the condition typically shows symmetric presentation^[3][4]
• Unilateral cases also well-documented^[1][5]

Anatomical and Embryological Basis

Normal Humeral Trochlear Anatomy

The humeral trochlea is a critical anatomical structure:

• Pulley-like articular surface located on the distal anteromedial humerus, forming the medial component of the distal humeral articulation^[6][1]
• Serves as the articulating surface for the ulnar trochlear notch (semilunar notch), creating the primary hinge joint of the elbow (ulnohumeral articulation)^[6][1]
• Provides anterior angulation of the distal humerus, which is crucial for normal elbow mechanics and alignment^[7][6][1]
• Bordered by medial and lateral crests, forming a groove that guides ulnar motion during flexion and extension^[6][1]

Embryological Implications

The precise embryological basis for trochlear aplasia remains incompletely understood, but likely involves:****^[2][4][1][3]

• Failure of ossification of the trochlear region during fetal development
• Defective endochondral ossification in the distal humeral epiphysis, particularly in the region destined to become the trochlea
• Genetic dysplasia affecting bone formation in the distal humerus, as evidenced by familial aggregation^[4][3]

Unlike acquired trochlear hypoplasia (seen in tardy ulnar nerve palsy following cubitus varus from fracture malunion), trochlear aplasia is a primary developmental defect rather than a secondary consequence of trauma or deformity.^{[8][9][1][3][4]}

Clinical Features

Primary Deformities

Trochlear Aplasia/Hypoplasia

• Complete or near-complete absence of the normal trochlear articulating surface
• Flattened or irregular medial distal humerus where the trochlea should be located
• Loss of the anterior angulation normally present at the distal humerus
• Shallow ulnar articulation due to the absence of the reciprocal articular surface

Associated Skeletal Deformities

Cubitus Varus:

• Progressive development of varus deformity (decreased carrying angle, often becoming negative or near-zero)^[5][1][3][4]
• Medial shift of the ulna relative to the humerus
• May be bilateral and symmetric when involvement is bilateral^[3][4]
• Progressive nature: may worsen over time as growth continues and mechanical stresses accumulate^[1][5]

Elbow Joint Abnormalities:

• Altered joint mechanics due to loss of the normal articulating surface
• Shallow ulnar groove or absence of normal groove configuration
• Deformity of the medial epicondyle in some cases
• Alteration of elbow range of motion in some patients, though others maintain relatively preserved motion

Neurological Complications

Ulnar Nerve Palsy:
This is the most significant and often delayed-onset neurological complication:

• Mechanism of nerve compression:
  • Progressive cubitus varus leads to stretching and angulation of the ulnar nerve at the elbow
  • The nerve, normally mobile within the cubital tunnel, becomes fixed or compressed by the abnormal anatomy
  • Fibrous bands may form across the medial elbow compartment, contributing to compression
  • Chronic traction and compression lead to progressive demyelination and axonal loss^[5][1]
• Clinical presentation of ulnar nerve palsy:
  • Delayed onset: Many patients remain asymptomatic for years or decades, then develop progressive paresthesias
  • Paresthesias in ulnar distribution: Numbness or tingling in the 4th and 5th fingers, medial hand, and medial forearm
  • Weakness of ulnar-innervated muscles:
    • Intrinsic hand muscles (interossei, lumbricals)
    • Hypothenar muscles (abductor digiti minimi, flexor digiti minimi)
    • Medial forearm muscles (flexor carpi ulnaris, medial half of flexor digitorum profundus)
  • Claw hand deformity in severe cases (hyperextension of metacarpophalangeal joints, flexion of interphalangeal joints)
  • Froment’s sign positive (flexion of interphalangeal joint of thumb during lateral pinch, indicating intrinsic hand muscle weakness)^[1][5]
• Severity progression:
  • Mild: Paresthesias only, no motor deficit
  • Moderate: Motor weakness becomes apparent, affecting grip and dexterity
  • Severe: Significant hand weakness and loss of intrinsic function, potentially disabling
  • McGowan grading (used for cubital tunnel syndrome severity): Grade I (sensory only), Grade II (mild motor), Grade III (severe motor with claw hand)^[8][5]

Associated Features

Elbow Motion and Function:

• Variable range of motion: Some patients have relatively preserved flexion-extension, while others show limitation
• Forearm rotation (pronation/supination): May be relatively preserved, though instability may limit pain-free motion

Pain:

• Localized elbow pain in some patients, particularly at the medial elbow
• Pain with varus stress to the elbow
• Severity varies from minimal to quite limiting

Cosmetic Appearance:

• Visible deformity: Cubitus varus becomes increasingly apparent, altering the silhouette of the elbow and arm
• Asymmetry: In unilateral cases, noticeable difference between arms

Diagnostic Approach

Clinical Evaluation

History:

• Family history of elbow deformities or neurological problems
• Age at onset of symptoms (if any)
• Progressive nature of deformity or symptoms
• Occupational or functional limitations
• Presence or absence of neurological symptoms (paresthesias, weakness)

Physical Examination:

1. Inspection:
   1. Visual assessment for cubitus varus deformity
   1. Comparison with contralateral elbow (if unilateral) or family members (if familial)
   1. Presence of swelling, warmth, or visible abnormalities
2. Palpation:
   1. Palpation of medial and lateral elbow prominences
   1. Assessment of medial epicondyle
   1. Tenderness over the ulnar nerve or cubital tunnel region
3. Stability Testing:
   1. Varus stress testing: Elbow flexed 20–30°, varus force applied to assess for instability or pain
   1. Valgus stress testing: To compare with normal elbow laxity
4. Range of Motion:
   1. Flexion-extension: Often relatively preserved in many cases; measurements recorded
   1. Pronation-supination: Assessment of forearm rotation
5. Neurological Examination (critical):
   1. Sensory testing: Light touch and two-point discrimination in ulnar distribution (4th and 5th fingers, medial hand)
   1. Motor testing:
      1. Intrinsic hand muscles: Interossei strength (finger abduction/adduction)
      1. First dorsal interosseous: Key indicator of early ulnar palsy
      1. Adductor pollicis: Froment’s sign
      1. Flexor carpi ulnaris: Wrist flexion and ulnar deviation
   1. Nerve percussion: Tinel’s sign at cubital tunnel (though less specific)
   1. Electrodiagnostic studies: EMG/NCS to confirm ulnar nerve dysfunction and assess severity

Imaging Studies

Plain Radiographs:

1. Anteroposterior (AP) and Lateral Views:
   1. Demonstrates absence or severe hypoplasia of the trochlear prominence
   1. Shows the flattened or irregular medial distal humerus
   1. Reveals cubitus varus deformity (negative or reduced carrying angle)
   1. Medial shift of the ulna may be visible
   1. Deformity of the medial epicondyle may be noted
2. Measurements:
   1. Carrying angle: Normal 6–26° valgus; in trochlear aplasia, often negative or close to zero^[9][8]
   1. Trochlear notch angle: May be abnormal due to altered trochlear anatomy^[9]

Advanced Imaging:

1. Computed Tomography (CT):
   1. Excellent bony detail of the trochlear region
   1. Demonstrates three-dimensional anatomy of the deformity
   1. Shows the exact extent of trochlear hypoplasia/aplasia
   1. CT arthrography (if articular cartilage anatomy is unclear) may be useful, though less commonly needed
   1. Helpful for surgical planning if intervention is contemplated
2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):
   1. Soft tissue detail: Visualizes the ulnar nerve, surrounding musculature, and ligaments
   1. May show compression of the ulnar nerve by fibrotic bands or abnormal anatomy
   1. Assesses intra-articular cartilage and joint space
   1. Useful for evaluating secondary osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration if present
   1. Can document nerve edema or signal changes suggesting compression or ischemia

Dynamic Imaging Considerations:

• Varus stress radiographs may reveal increased medial joint laxity or abnormal alignment
• Ultrasound can be used to assess ulnar nerve cross-sectional area and detect compression

Electrodiagnostic Studies

Electromyography (EMG) and Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS):

• Motor NCS to the ulnar nerve:
  • Reduced compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) amplitude in ulnar-innervated muscles
  • Possibly slowing of conduction velocity across the elbow (though less common)
• Sensory NCS:
  • Reduced or absent sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) in the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve or ulnar proper sensory fibers
• Needle EMG:
  • Evidence of denervation (fibrillations, positive sharp waves) in ulnar-innervated intrinsic hand muscles
  • Chronic changes: Motor unit action potential (MUAP) remodeling reflecting long-standing denervation and reinnervation
• Quantification: Severity grading helps inform management decisions (particularly regarding timing of surgical intervention)

Differential Diagnosis

Humerus trochlea aplasia must be distinguished from other conditions causing ulnar nerve compression or cubitus varus:

Condition	Key Distinguishing Features
Cubitus varus from distal humeral fracture (post-traumatic)	History of prior fracture, acquired deformity, trochlear hypoplasia is secondary to trauma[8][9]
Hegemann disease / Fishtail deformity	Acquired trochlear disturbance post-traumatic, progressive narrowing of trochlear notch[9]
Larsen syndrome	Multiple joint dislocations, facial anomalies, familial but involves multiple joints beyond elbow[10][11]
Tardy ulnar nerve palsy (non-congenital cubitus varus)	Acquired varus deformity, ulnar nerve palsy develops years after trauma, trochlea usually normal[8]
Condylar hypoplasia (lateral or medial)	Isolated condylar deficiency; trochlea more typically preserved[6]
Congenital elbow ankylosis or synostosis	Different morphology; reduced or fixed joint motion rather than instability[12][6][7]
Nerve entrapment from other causes	Anconeus epitrochlearis, Gantzer’s muscle, or other anatomic variations without trochlear aplasia[6]

Management

Management of humerus trochlea aplasia is individualized, based on symptom severity, rate of progression, and functional impact.

Conservative Management

Observation:

• Indicated for asymptomatic patients or those with mild deformity and no neurological symptoms
• Regular follow-up including:
  • Clinical examination every 6–12 months to assess for deformity progression
  • Neurological examination to detect early signs of ulnar nerve involvement
  • Imaging (radiographs) periodically to document deformity changes

Activity Modification:

• Avoid repetitive varus stress to the elbow
• Use ergonomic modifications to minimize stress on the affected elbow during occupational activities
• Activity-specific counseling regarding safe functional positioning

Physical Therapy:

• Maintenance of elbow range of motion through gentle, non-forced mobility exercises
• Upper extremity strengthening (particularly shoulder and proximal arm) to reduce compensatory stress on the elbow
• Postural education to avoid habitual positions that stress the medial elbow

Pharmacological Management

Symptomatic Treatment:

• Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain relief and inflammation control
• Analgesics as needed for localized elbow pain
• Gabapentin or other neuropathic pain agents if ulnar nerve-related paresthesias are bothersome (though evidence is limited)

Surgical Management

Indications for Surgical Intervention:

1. Progressive Ulnar Nerve Palsy:
   1. Worsening neurological symptoms documented by clinical examination or electrodiagnostics
   1. Moderate-to-severe functional limitation affecting hand function
   1. Failure of conservative management to halt progression
2. Severe Symptomatic Cubitus Varus:
   1. Significant cosmetic concern to patient
   1. Functional limitation from deformity
   1. Risk of further progression
3. Secondary Osteoarthritis:
   1. Development of post-traumatic arthritis in the elbow joint
   1. Pain limiting function

Surgical Procedures

Ulnar Nerve Decompression and Anterior Transposition:

• Primary surgical intervention for ulnar nerve palsy^[5][1]
• Approach: Medial elbow incision in the forearm
• Technical steps:
  • Identification and isolation of ulnar nerve
  • Release of fibrous bands compressing the nerve
  • Division of Osborne’s ligament (covering the cubital tunnel)
  • Possible division of the two heads of flexor carpi ulnaris (common site of compression)
  • Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve to reduce angulation and traction
  • Securing the nerve anteriorly (suturing or wrapping) to prevent re-subluxation
• Indications for anterior transposition:
  • When significant angulation or traction is present
  • When ulnar nerve subluxation occurs with elbow flexion
  • When the ulnar groove is severely dysplastic (as in aplasia)
• Expected outcomes:
  • Halting of progressive neurological deterioration
  • Potential improvement in existing neurological symptoms, though sensory recovery is often incomplete
  • Motor recovery varies; greater improvement expected with earlier intervention^[1][5]

Corrective Osteotomy (for Cubitus Varus):

• Indications: Significant varus deformity causing functional or cosmetic concern
• Timing: Usually deferred until skeletal maturity to allow all deformity to develop fully
• Surgical approaches:
  • Lateral closing-wedge osteotomy: More commonly performed
    • Removes a wedge of bone from the lateral distal humerus
    • Corrects varus while maintaining length
    • Risk: Ulnar nerve injury if correction is excessive^[13]
  • Medial opening-wedge osteotomy: Less commonly used; requires allograft or autograft
• Bone fixation: Internal fixation with plates and screws
• Combined procedure: Many patients benefit from simultaneous osteotomy and ulnar nerve transposition to address both the structural deformity and nerve compression^[5][1]

Surgical Outcomes and Prognosis After Intervention

• Ulnar nerve decompression:
  • Effectiveness in halting progression of neurological symptoms: Generally good
  • Motor recovery: Variable; depends on severity and chronicity of compression. Early intervention (before severe axonal loss) yields better results
  • Sensory recovery: Often incomplete
  • Pain relief: Usually achieved after decompression^[1][5]
• Osteotomy for varus correction:
  • Cosmetic and biomechanical improvement: Generally favorable
  • Recurrence of deformity: Possible if progressive dysplasia continues (especially in growing children)
  • Complications: Ulnar nerve injury with overcorrection, vascular injury, non-union, infection, altered elbow mechanics

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosis

Natural History Without Treatment

• Variable course: Some patients remain relatively stable with minimal deformity and no neurological symptoms
• Progressive cases: Other patients develop progressive cubitus varus and insidious ulnar nerve palsy over years to decades
• Delayed-onset complications: Even asymptomatic patients in childhood may develop ulnar nerve palsy in middle age or later
• Quality of life impact: Ranges from minimal (asymptomatic patients) to significant (those with hand dysfunction from ulnar palsy)

Factors Affecting Prognosis

Favorable Factors:

• Young age at symptom onset (allows earlier intervention before severe nerve damage)
• Mild initial deformity
• Absence of neurological symptoms at presentation
• Good compliance with follow-up and conservative measures
• Unilateral involvement (bilateral involvement may be more progressive)

Unfavorable Factors:

• Progressive cubitus varus deformity
• Development or worsening of ulnar nerve symptoms
• Severe trochlear dysplasia
• Delayed recognition (chronic compression before diagnosis)
• Bilateral involvement

Key Clinical Pearls

1. Rare but significant: Humerus trochlea aplasia, though extraordinarily rare, is an important diagnosis to consider in patients presenting with familial cubitus varus and delayed-onset ulnar nerve palsy, particularly with Japanese or Asian ethnicity^[4][3][5][1]
2. Delayed presentation: Unlike many congenital elbow anomalies recognized in infancy, trochlear aplasia may remain clinically silent for years, manifesting only when neurological complications develop^[5][1]
3. Genetic basis: Familial clustering and bilateral symmetric involvement in many cases support an inheritable genetic cause, though the specific genes involved have not been definitively identified
4. Progressive course: Serial clinical and electrodiagnostic monitoring is essential to detect early signs of ulnar nerve compromise
5. Multidisciplinary approach: Optimal management often requires coordination between orthopedic surgeons, hand surgeons, neurologists, and possibly geneticists
6. Surgical intervention timing: While conservative management is appropriate for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients, earlier surgical intervention in progressively symptomatic patients may prevent severe neurological deterioration

Conclusion

Humerus trochlea aplasia is an exceptionally rare congenital skeletal dysplasia affecting the distal humerus, characterized by complete or near-complete absence of the trochlear articulating surface. Though described primarily in Japanese families, this condition represents a worldwide rarity in orthopedic pathology.

The clinical significance of trochlear aplasia lies in its potential to precipitate progressive cubitus varus deformity and delayed-onset ulnar nerve palsy—complications that may emerge years after birth due to the abnormal biomechanics and anatomical constraints of the dysplastic elbow. While many patients remain asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic throughout life, others develop progressive neurological deterioration requiring surgical intervention.

Diagnosis is primarily radiographic, demonstrated by imaging showing the characteristic trochlear hypoplasia or aplasia. Management is individualized, ranging from conservative observation with serial monitoring in asymptomatic patients to surgical intervention (ulnar nerve decompression and possible corrective osteotomy) in those with progressive neurological symptoms or significant deformity.

With appropriate recognition, careful long-term follow-up, and timely surgical intervention when indicated, affected individuals can be managed effectively to minimize disability and preserve hand function.^[3][4][1][5]

References

1. Singapore Medical Journal – Congenital Developmental Abnormalities^[1]
2. NORD – Humeral Agenesis/Hypoplasia^[14]
3. ClinicalGate – Congenital Abnormalities of the Elbow^[12][7][6]
4. Orphanet – Humerus Trochlea Aplasia (ORPHA:3383)^[4][3]
5. NCBI MedGen – Humerus Trochlea Aplasia Concept^[3]
6. Musculoskeletal Key – Congenital Abnormalities of the Elbow^[7]
7. PubMed – Tardy Ulnar Nerve Palsy Caused by Cubitus Varus Deformity^[8]
8. PubMed Central – Persistent Ulnar Nerve Palsy with Cubitus Valgus^[15]
9. PubMed Central – Post-traumatic Disturbance of Humeral Epiphysis (Hegemann Disease)^[9]
10. PubMed Central – Medial Condyle Hypoplasia^[16]
11. PubMed – Hypoplasia of Bilateral Humeral Trochlea Associated with Ulnar Nerve Palsy^[5]
12. PubMed Central – Congenital Versus Isolated Traumatic Radial Head Dislocation^[17]
13. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research – Humeral Trochlear Morphology and Elbow Dislocation^[18]
14. Radiopaedia – Imaging of Congenital Elbow Abnormalities^[19]
15. UKBB – Congenital and Acquired Deformities of the Elbow^[20]
16. MSS-IJMSR – Congenital Anterior Radial Head Dislocation^[21]
17. Clinical Imaging Science – Congenital Pulmonary Artery Anomalies^[22]
18. PubMed Central – Ulnar Nerve Injury Post-Cubitus Varus Correction^[13]
19. PubMed Central – Tendon Transfers for Ulnar Nerve Palsy^[23]
20. American Journal of Roentgenology – Skeletal Development of Proximal Humerus^[24]

Sources

1. http://smj.sma.org.sg/0404/0404smj2.pdf                         
2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/036350239090033N  
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/medgen/348185                
4. https://www.orpha.net/en/disease/detail/3383              
5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11110147/                   
6. https://clinicalpub.com/congenital-abnormalities-of-the-elbow/       
7. https://musculoskeletalkey.com/congenital-abnormalities-of-the-elbow/   
8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7722265/     
9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7738597/     
10. https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/1/1/article-p107.xml
11. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pd.2164
12. https://clinicalgate.com/congenital-abnormalities-of-the-elbow/ 
13. https://joas.org.in/ulnar-nerve-injury-post-cubitus-varus-correction-by-lateral-closing-wedge-osteotomy-lessons-learnt/ 
14. https://rarediseases.org/mondo-disease/humeral-agenesis-hypoplasia/
15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465754/
16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10948159/
17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12456254/
18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10014637/
19. https://radiologykey.com/the-elbow-and-forearm-congenital-and-developmental-conditions/
20. https://www.ukbb.ch/en/treatment-care/clinical-pictures/congenital-and-acquired-deformities-of-the-elbow/
21. https://mss-ijmsr.com/congenital-anterior-radial-head-dislocation-with-valgus-deformity-a-case-report/
22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10219573/
23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2741332/
24. https://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.13.10711
25. http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0038-1632700
26. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1989.tb03374.x
27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6868685/
28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10325645/
29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10605817/
30. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1716/pdf?version=1698046370
31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3162196/
32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9522744/
33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473726/
34. https://www.akcchf.org/elbow-dysplasia-07-1997/?swpmtx=938b99b28e0d0262f961862c46f1ea30&swpmtxnonce=51699cb000
35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003277814001099
36. https://www.vet.cornell.edu/departments-centers-and-institutes/riney-canine-health-center/canine-health-topics/elbow-dysplasia
37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036350239090033N/pdf?md5=9fa033f85535305a946cd06d82fb31d2&pid=1-s2.0-036350239090033N-main.pdf
38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6147980/
39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1718383/
40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4799456/
41. https://jcrpe.org/articles/doi/jcrpe.463
42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4261289/
43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2899349/
44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5767801/
45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1050402/
46. https://www.morthoj.org/2013/v7n1/post-traumatic-radial-head-dislocation.pdf
47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1741-4520.1995.tb00311.x
48. https://www.qeios.com/read/IV28UZ/pdf
49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4094123/
50. https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/case_report/pdf/273652/20240806-266317-z60mxq.pdf
51. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23259671211028269