Hay Wells syndrome

Hay Wells Syndrome: A Comprehensive Medical Review

Introduction

Hay-Wells syndrome (also known as AEC syndrome or ankyloblepharon-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome; OMIM #106260) is a rare autosomal dominant ectodermal dysplasia characterized by the distinctive triad of ankyloblepharon (fusion of eyelid margins), severe ectodermal dysplasia with prominent skin erosions, and cleft lip and/or palate. First described by Hay and Wells in 1976, this syndrome has been recognized as one of the more distinctive forms of ectodermal dysplasia among over 180 identified ectodermal dysplasia syndromes.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

According to the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD), MedlinePlus (NIH), Orphanet, and peer-reviewed medical literature, Hay-Wells syndrome is caused by heterozygous missense mutations in the TP63 gene (tumor protein 63) located on chromosome 3q27-28, specifically affecting the SAM domain (Sterile Alpha Motif), which encodes a protein-protein interaction domain critical for normal development.^[3]^[5]

The exact prevalence of Hay-Wells syndrome is unknown, though it is considered rare, affecting individuals of all ethnic backgrounds equally. The condition is characterized by profound ectodermal dysfunction affecting hair, teeth, nails, skin, and sweat glands, combined with distinctive ocular findings and orofacial clefting.^[6]^[2]^[1]^[3]

Etiology and Genetics

Genetic Basis

Hay-Wells syndrome is caused by heterozygous missense mutations in the TP63 gene:^[5]^[3]

Gene and Chromosomal Location:

Gene: TP63 (Tumor Protein 63, also known as TP73L)
Chromosomal location: 3q27-28 (long arm of chromosome 3)
Protein: p63 transcription factor
Inheritance pattern: Autosomal dominant
De novo mutations: Most cases result from new mutations; familial cases also reported ^[3]^[5]

TP63 Protein Function:
According to molecular biology and developmental studies, p63 is essential for normal development and maintenance of stratified epithelia:^[4]^[5]

Transcription factor: Regulates genes controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis
Epithelial development: Critical for proper development of skin, hair follicles, teeth, and nails
Craniofacial development: Required for normal facial morphogenesis
Limb development: Plays role in proper limb formation
Cell maintenance: Essential for continued health of stratified epithelial tissues ^[4]^[5]

Molecular Pathophysiology

SAM Domain Mutations:
The hallmark of Hay-Wells syndrome:^[6]^[5]^[4]

Location: Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) domain at C-terminus of p63
Function of SAM domain: Protein-protein interaction domain
Mechanism: Missense mutations disrupt protein-protein interactions
Effect: Compromises p63 function in transcriptional regulation
Specificity: SAM domain mutations associated with more severe skin erosions than other TP63 mutations ^[6]^[4]

Consequences of TP63 Mutations:

Epidermal dysfunction: Impaired cell adhesion and differentiation
Epithelial fragility: Increased susceptibility to erosions and blistering
Appendage abnormalities: Defective hair, nail, and tooth development
Glandular dysfunction: Reduced sweat gland function
Ocular involvement: Abnormal eyelid development leading to ankyloblepharon ^[3]^[4]

Allelic Variants

Hay-Wells syndrome is one of several TP63-related ectodermal dysplasia syndromes:^[7]^[8]^[3]

Other TP63-Related Syndromes:

Rapp-Hodgkin syndrome: Now considered part of AEC/Hay-Wells spectrum
EEC syndrome: Ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting (characterized by split hand/foot)
ADULT syndrome: Acro-dermato-ungual-lacrimal-tooth syndrome
Limb-mammary syndrome: Mammary gland hypoplasia with limb findings ^[7]^[3]

Relationship Among Syndromes:

TP63 gene mutations: Cause all above syndromes
Specific mutations: Different mutations associated with different syndrome phenotypes
Overlap: Considerable overlap in clinical features
Hierarchical classification: Genotype-phenotype correlation helps classify syndrome type ^[8]^[3]

Clinical Presentation

Demographics and Epidemiology

According to published literature and rare disease registries:^[2]^[1]^[3]

Prevalence and Epidemiology:

Prevalence: Exact prevalence unknown; considered rare
Gender: Affects males and females equally
Age of onset: Present from birth; typically recognized at birth or in infancy
Ethnic distribution: No ethnic predilection; all ethnic groups affected equally
Inheritance: Autosomal dominant; both sporadic and familial cases reported ^[3]

Severity Variability:

Spectrum: Variable expression even within same family
Penetrance: High penetrance but variable expressivity
Mild forms: May be overlooked in infancy
Severe forms: Readily apparent at birth with obvious features ^[2]^[3]

Cardinal Clinical Features

Hay-Wells syndrome presents with a distinctive constellation of features affecting multiple systems:^[1]^[6]^[3]

Major Diagnostic Features

1. Ankyloblepharon Filiforme Adnatum:

The hallmark ocular finding unique to Hay-Wells syndrome:^[9]^[1]^[3]

Clinical Characteristics:

Definition: Fibrous adhesions between eyelid margins
Presentation: Partial thickness fusion (not complete ankylosis)
Severity: Ranges from fine fibrous strands to broader adhesions
Location: Upper and lower eyelids, typically medial to central portion
Bilateral involvement: Usually bilateral and symmetric
Visual consequence: May restrict eye opening and affect vision
Onset: Present at birth ^[1]^[3]

Clinical Appearance:

“Tied down” lids: Appearance of eyelids held together by tissue strands
Reduced palpebral fissure: Narrowed eye opening
Possible coloboma: Defect in eyelid structure (associated finding)
Ectropion or entropion: May develop secondary to adhesions ^[9]^[1]

2. Ectodermal Dysplasia with Severe Skin Erosions:

The most distinctive ectodermal manifestation:^[1]^[6]^[3]

Skin Abnormalities:

Erosions:

Location: Predominantly scalp (especially high-trauma areas), face, neck, and extremities
Severity: Mild to severe, sometimes requiring intensive wound care
Onset: Present from birth or develop in early infancy
Etiology: Fragility of epidermis with propensity for blistering and erosion
Healing: Variable, can leave atrophic scars
Infection risk: High risk for secondary bacterial infection ^[6]^[1]^[3]

Hair Abnormalities (Hypotrichosis):

Density: Sparse, reduced hair volume
Quality: Coarse, wiry hair texture
Scalp: Areas of alopecia with scarring
Distribution: Often asymmetric with worse involvement in areas of erosions
Eyebrows and eyelashes: Sparse or absent ^[1]^[3]

Nail Abnormalities:

Dystrophy: Malformed, ridged, or discolored nails
Absence: Some nails may be completely absent (anonychia)
Nail pits: Punctate depressions in nail surface
Fingernails vs. toenails: More severe in fingernails
Progressive: May worsen with age ^[3]^[1]

Skin Pigmentation Changes:

Hyperpigmentation: Areas of increased pigmentation
Hypopigmentation: Patchy lighter areas
Follicular hyperkeratosis: Bumpy skin texture
Palmoplantar keratoderma: Thickened skin on palms and soles
Periocular erythema: Redness around eyes ^[2]^[3]

3. Cleft Lip and/or Palate:

Orofacial manifestation present in most cases:^[9]^[1]^[3]

Clefting Patterns:

Cleft palate alone: Most common presentation
Cleft lip with palate: Frequently seen
Cleft lip alone: Less common
Unilateral or bilateral: Variable presentation
Complete vs. incomplete: Both occur ^[9]^[3]

Associated Oral Features:

Hypodontia: Missing teeth, particularly permanent teeth
Anodontia: Complete absence of teeth in severe cases
Microdontia: Small teeth
Delayed eruption: Late tooth eruption
Enamel dysplasia: Defective tooth enamel ^[2]^[1]

4. Additional Ectodermal Features:

Sweat Gland Dysfunction:

Hypohidrosis: Reduced or absent sweating
Severity: Usually mild but can be significant
Consequence: Heat intolerance
Reduced sweat pores: Documented by sweat pore counting ^[1]^[3]

Lacrimal Gland Involvement:

Reduced tear production: Abnormal Schirmer test
Dry eyes: Decreased tear film lubrication
Keratitis risk: Susceptibility to corneal damage
Epiphora: Tearing paradoxically in some patients ^[3]^[1]

Additional Clinical Features

Facial Dysmorphisms:

Broad nose: Flattened nasal bridge
Malar hypoplasia: Underdeveloped cheekbones
Micrognathia: Small lower jaw (variable)
Long philtrum: Lengthened groove between nose and upper lip
Frontal bossing: Prominent forehead ^[1]^[3]

Limb Abnormalities:
Distinguishes Hay-Wells from EEC syndrome:^[4]^[3]

Absent or minimal: Unlike EEC with prominent split hand/foot
When present: Subtle structural abnormalities or skin involvement
Finger/toe involvement: Primarily skin-related, not skeletal splitting ^[4]^[3]

Urogenital Anomalies:

Hypospadias: Abnormal urethral opening (males)
Micropenis: Small penis
Urinary symptoms: Secondary to structural anomalies
Cryptorchidism: Undescended testes (occasional)^[6]^[1]

Follicular Abnormalities:

Follicular keratosis: Bumpy, rough skin
Horny follicles: Keratotic projections
Particularly affected: Extensor surfaces of extremities ^[2]^[3]

Severity Spectrum

Mild Form:

Subtle ankyloblepharon (may require close examination to detect)
Minimal skin erosions
Sparse hair and nails but functionally adequate
Cleft palate without cleft lip
Normal development and good quality of life ^[3]

Moderate Form:

Obvious ankyloblepharon requiring possible surgical intervention
Significant skin erosions requiring wound care
Notable hair and nail abnormalities
Cleft lip and palate requiring reconstruction
Variable developmental concerns ^[1]^[3]

Severe Form:

Extensive fibrous adhesions causing visual impairment
Widespread, severe skin erosions with high infection risk
Significant alopecia with scarring
Multiple missing teeth or anodontia
Multiple surgeries required
Complex medical and developmental needs ^[6]^[3]

Diagnosis

Clinical Diagnostic Approach

The diagnosis of Hay-Wells syndrome is primarily clinical, based on recognition of characteristic features:^[9]^[2]^[3]

Clinical Diagnostic Criteria:
According to established diagnostic protocols:^[2]^[3]

Ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum: Present at birth
Severe skin erosions: Especially scalp involvement
Ectodermal dysplasia: Hair, nail, tooth, and sweat gland abnormalities
Cleft lip and/or palate: In majority of cases
Autosomal dominant inheritance: Family history or de novo mutation

Clinical Evaluation:

Physical Examination:

Ophthalmologic assessment: Detailed eyelid examination for ankyloblepharon
Dermatological exam: Map and document all erosions and skin findings
Hair and nail evaluation: Document density, texture, quality
Oral examination: Assess dental development, cleft extent
Systemic examination: Identify associated features ^[9]^[3]

Diagnostic Tests:

Sweat pore count: Reduced in hypohidrotic cases
Schirmer test: Assess tear production
Dental radiographs: Document missing teeth
Photography: Document clinical features for records ^[2]

Molecular Genetic Testing

TP63 Gene Sequencing:
Confirmatory diagnostic test:^[5]^[3]

Method: Complete gene sequencing
Target: SAM domain mutations
Detection rate: Identifies mutations in majority of clinically diagnosed cases
Variant confirmation: Missense mutations most common in Hay-Wells ^[5]^[3]

Genetic Counseling:

Inheritance pattern: Autosomal dominant
Recurrence risk: 50% if parent affected; low if de novo
Penetrance and expressivity: High penetrance but variable expression
Phenotypic prediction: Difficult to predict severity based on genotype ^[3]

Differential Diagnosis

Hay-Wells syndrome must be differentiated from other ectodermal dysplasias and conditions:^[8]^[2]^[3]

Primary Differential Diagnoses:

1. EEC Syndrome (Ectrodactyly-Ectodermal Dysplasia-Clefting):

Similarities: Ectodermal dysplasia, cleft lip/palate, TP63 mutations
Key differences: Prominent split hand/foot malformations (absent in Hay-Wells), no ankyloblepharon
Genetic basis: Different TP63 mutations (typically in DNA-binding domain vs. SAM domain)
Inheritance: Autosomal dominant ^[8]^[3]

2. ADULT Syndrome (Acro-Dermato-Ungual-Lacrimal-Tooth):

Similarities: Ectodermal dysplasia, lacrimal duct absence, dental abnormalities
Key differences: Distinctive periungual papillomas, no ankyloblepharon, no significant clefting
Genetic basis: TP63 mutations (different from Hay-Wells)^[3]

3. Limb-Mammary Syndrome:

Similarities: TP63 mutations, ectodermal dysplasia
Key differences: Mammary gland hypoplasia, limb malformations, no ankyloblepharon
Genetic basis: TP63 mutations ^[3]

4. Rapp-Hodgkin Syndrome:

Similarities: Ectodermal dysplasia, sometimes cleft palate
Key differences: No ankyloblepharon, no significant skin erosions
Current classification: Now considered part of Hay-Wells/AEC spectrum ^[3]

5. Other Syndromes with Cleft Palate:

Treacher Collins syndrome: Mandibulofacial dysostosis features
Nager syndrome: Acrofacial dysostosis
Pierre Robin sequence: Micrognathia primary feature ^[3]

Management and Treatment

Treatment Philosophy

Currently, there is no curative treatment for Hay-Wells syndrome; management is supportive and focuses on preventing complications, addressing symptoms, and optimizing quality of life:^[9]^[2]^[3]

Treatment Goals:

Skin management: Prevent infection and promote healing of erosions
Ocular care: Preserve vision and address ankyloblepharon
Surgical correction: Repair cleft lip/palate and separate eyelid adhesions
Dental management: Maximize dental function
Developmental support: Optimize growth and development ^[9]^[3]

Dermatological Management

Acute Erosion Care:
Essential in infancy and early childhood:^[6]^[1]^[3]

Wound care: Gentle cleansing with sterile saline
Topical antibiotics: Bacitracin ointment or mupirocin 2% for preventing infection
Emollients: Thick moisturizers to promote healing
Gentle handling: Careful nursing to minimize trauma
Infection prevention: Vigilant monitoring for secondary infection ^[6]^[1]

Long-term Skin Care:

Emollients: Heavy creams or ointments daily
Topical medications: As needed for erosions or infections
Sun protection: Avoid excessive sun exposure (can worsen erosions)
Humidity control: Keep skin moisturized in dry environments
Trauma prevention: Minimize friction and injury ^[3]

Prevention of Infection:
Given high infection risk:^[1]^[6]

Regular assessment: Frequent skin examination
Antibiotic therapy: Topical or systemic for active infections
Hygiene measures: Maintain cleanliness without harsh scrubbing
Vaccination: Ensure up-to-date immunizations
Early intervention: Aggressive treatment of any signs of infection ^[6]^[1]

Ophthalmological Management

Ankyloblepharon Management:
Variable treatment approach based on severity:^[9]^[3]

Conservative Management:
For mild adhesions with adequate eye opening:

Observation: Close monitoring of visual development
Protective measures: Lubricating drops for tear film supplementation
Ointment: Nighttime ocular ointment for comfort
Regular assessment: Ophthalmology follow-up ^[9]

Surgical Intervention:
For significant ankyloblepharon affecting vision:^[9]^[3]

Timing: Usually delayed until adequate age for safe surgery
Technique: Careful separation of adhesions
Reconstruction: May require mucous membrane grafting
Post-operative care: Prevent re-adhesion with splinting and close follow-up ^[9]

Associated Ocular Features:

Lubricating drops: For reduced tear production
Protective eyewear: Glasses or shields as needed
Monitoring: Regular ophthalmologic surveillance for complications
Referral: To specialized centers if complex management needed ^[9]

Surgical Reconstruction

Cleft Lip and Palate Repair:
Standard cleft surgical protocols:^[9]^[3]

Cleft Lip Repair:

Timing: Typically 3-6 months of age
Techniques: Standard surgical methods generally safe
Considerations: Careful wound management given skin fragility
Good outcomes: Reported without increased complications ^[9]

Cleft Palate Repair:

Timing: Usually 9-18 months of age
Techniques: Standard palatoplasty procedures
Healing: Generally good healing despite compromised skin
Speech outcomes: Often good post-repair ^[9]

Scar Revision and Secondary Procedures:

Timing: After primary healing complete
Indications: Improve cosmetic appearance
Techniques: Standard revision techniques ^[9]

Dental Management

Comprehensive Dental Care:
Essential for optimal oral function:^[1]^[3]

Preventive care: Regular cleaning and fluoride application
Restorative treatment: Management of cavities when teeth present
Prosthodontics: Dentures or partial dentures if significant hypodontia
Orthodontia: Alignment of teeth when adequate number present
Specialist referral: Pediatric dentistry with genetic syndrome experience ^[3]

Multidisciplinary Care

Essential Specialists:
Coordinated team approach needed:^[3]^[9]

Dermatology: Skin management
Ophthalmology: Ocular care
Plastic surgery: Cleft repair and reconstruction
Dentistry: Dental and oral management
Pediatrics: Primary medical care
Genetics: Genetic counseling and management ^[3]^[9]

Comprehensive Monitoring:

Regular assessment: Multidisciplinary clinic visits
Developmental screening: Monitor growth and development
Psychological support: Address emotional and social needs
Family support: Guidance and resources ^[3]

Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes

Overall Prognosis

The prognosis for Hay-Wells syndrome is generally favorable for surviving to adulthood, though quality of life depends on severity:^[2]^[9]^[3]

Life Expectancy:

Normal lifespan: Generally expected with appropriate management
Neonatal mortality: Rare, except in most severe cases
Childhood and adulthood: Most reach adulthood ^[2]^[9]

Organ-Specific Outcomes

Skin:

Erosion healing: Usually improve after infancy
Residual findings: Permanent alopecia, scars, and pigmentation changes
Infection risk: Decreases with age as skin matures ^[3]

Ocular:

Vision: Generally good if ankyloblepharon managed appropriately
Tear production: Mild lacrimal insufficiency may persist
Cosmetic appearance: Improved with surgical release of adhesions ^[9]^[3]

Orofacial:

Cleft repair outcomes: Good surgical results reported
Speech: Usually develops normally post-repair
Dentition: Variable depending on degree of hypodontia
Eating function: Most achieve adequate nutrition ^[9]^[3]

Systemic:

Thermal regulation: Heat intolerance may persist due to hypohidrosis
Overall function: Most achieve independence
Quality of life: Generally good with appropriate management ^[2]

Developmental Outcomes

Intellectual development: Normal intelligence in most cases
Developmental delays: Rare unless other complications
Educational achievement: Most attend mainstream education
Social integration: Good outcomes with cosmetic improvements ^[3]^[9]

Quality of Life Considerations

Positive Factors:

Visible improvements: Cleft repair and eyelid release improve appearance
Normal cognition: Preservation of intellectual abilities
Healing trend: Skin conditions often improve with maturation
Long survival: Normal or near-normal life expectancy ^[2]^[3]

Ongoing Challenges:

Cosmetic concerns: Permanent scarring and pigmentation changes
Physical limitations: Heat intolerance from hypohidrosis
Dental needs: Ongoing management of hypodontia
Psychological impact: Early intervention and support important ^[9]^[3]

Research Directions and Future Perspectives

Molecular Research

TP63 Function Studies:

Gene expression: Understanding p63 role in epithelial development
Mutation effects: Functional consequences of specific mutations
Compensatory mechanisms: Why SAM domain mutations less severe than other TP63 mutations
Therapeutic targets: Identifying pathways to enhance function ^[4]^[3]

Clinical Research

Natural History Studies:

Longitudinal follow-up: Understanding disease progression over time
Outcome databases: Registry of affected individuals
Genotype-phenotype correlations: Understanding mutation-specific effects
Quality of life: Systematic assessment of outcomes ^[3]

Therapeutic Development

Future Treatments:

Gene therapy: Potential for correcting TP63 mutations
Protein replacement: Replacement with functional p63 protein
Pharmacological enhancement: Drugs to improve residual function
Regenerative medicine: Stem cell approaches for skin regeneration ^[3]

Diagnostic Advances

Improved Testing:

Prenatal diagnosis: When mutations identified in families
Newborn screening: Potential for early identification
Biomarker development: Tests to predict severity or progression
Molecular databases: Cataloging mutations and effects ^[3]

Conclusion

Hay-Wells syndrome represents one of the distinctive forms of ectodermal dysplasia characterized by the unique combination of ankyloblepharon, severe skin erosions, and orofacial clefting. Since its description by Hay and Wells in 1976 and the identification of TP63 mutations as the genetic cause in 2001, understanding of this rare condition has advanced substantially. The recognition that SAM domain mutations specifically cause Hay-Wells syndrome, distinguishing it from other TP63-related syndromes, has refined diagnostic criteria and improved genetic counseling accuracy.

The hallmark findings of Hay-Wells syndrome—fibrous eyelid adhesions, profound but treatable skin fragility, and orofacial clefting—create a distinctive clinical picture that enables recognition at birth or in early infancy. The characteristically severe skin erosions, particularly over the scalp, represent the most significant clinical challenge in early management, requiring intensive wound care and vigilant infection prevention.

The multidisciplinary management approach incorporating dermatological wound care, ophthalmological assessment and intervention, and reconstructive surgery has substantially improved outcomes for affected individuals. The documentation that standard cleft lip and palate repair can be performed safely in Hay-Wells patients, despite underlying skin fragility, represents an important advance in surgical management.

The generally favorable prognosis for Hay-Wells syndrome, with most affected individuals surviving to adulthood and achieving reasonable quality of life, provides reassurance for affected families. The progressive improvement in skin conditions with age, the successful surgical correction of cleft defects and eyelid adhesions, and the preservation of normal cognitive function all contribute to optimistic long-term outcomes.

However, the persistent challenges of residual scarring, alopecia, dental abnormalities, and heat intolerance from hypohidrosis require ongoing management and psychological support. The visible cosmetic changes, while often substantially improved by reconstructive surgery, may continue to impact self-esteem and social integration for some individuals.

Future research directions, including continued investigation of TP63 function, development of animal models, and exploration of potential gene therapy approaches, hold promise for more targeted and effective treatments. The establishment of patient registries and systematic natural history studies will further advance understanding and enable evidence-based management protocols.

Healthcare providers should maintain awareness of Hay-Wells syndrome when evaluating infants with ankyloblepharon, significant scalp erosions, and cleft lip/palate. Early recognition enables appropriate genetic testing, accurate counseling, and prompt initiation of comprehensive multidisciplinary care. Genetic counseling for families is essential, emphasizing that most cases result from de novo mutations with very low recurrence risk for future pregnancies.

The study of Hay-Wells syndrome contributes valuable insights into the critical role of p63 in epithelial development and homeostasis, with implications extending beyond this specific condition to broader understanding of ectodermal dysplasias and epithelial biology.

Sources

Hay Wells syndrome

Hay Wells Syndrome: A Comprehensive Medical Review

Related Posts:

Recent Post

features

Categories

Weekly Newsletter